Lock vs Synchronized in Java: When and Why to Use Each
A detailed comparison of Java's synchronized keyword and the Lock API, explaining their differences, use cases, and best practices.
Lock vs Synchronized in Java: When and Why to Use Each
A detailed comparison of Java's synchronized keyword and the Lock API, explaining their differences, use cases, and best practices.
Introduction
In Java multithreaded programming, ensuring thread safety often involves using
synchronized or the Lock API.
A common interview question is:
When should you use
synchronized, and when should you useLock?
To answer this correctly, we need a clear understanding of how both mechanisms work and what trade-offs they involve.
synchronized
synchronized is Java’s built-in locking mechanism that enforces mutual exclusion
and memory visibility.
Each synchronized construct has two parts:
- A reference to the lock object
- For synchronized methods, the lock is the current object (
this)
- For synchronized methods, the lock is the current object (
- A block of code protected by the lock
Every Java object can act as a lock. These built-in locks are also known as intrinsic locks or monitor locks.
Usage Examples
// Method-level synchronization
public synchronized void synchronizedMethod() {
// critical section
}
// Block-level synchronization
synchronized (lockObject) {
// critical section
}Characteristics of synchronized
- Implicit lock acquisition and release
- Lock is released automatically when exiting the block or when an exception occurs
- Only one thread can hold the lock at a time (mutual exclusion)
- Simple and safe to use
Lock Interface
The Lock interface provides a more flexible and expressive locking mechanism
compared to synchronized.
Its key feature is that lock acquisition and release are explicit, giving developers more control.
Core Methods
public interface Lock {
void lock();
void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException;
boolean tryLock();
boolean tryLock(long time, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException;
void unlock();
Condition newCondition();
}Typical Usage Pattern
Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
lock.lock();
try {
// critical section
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}Using finally is critical to avoid deadlocks caused by forgotten unlock calls.
Key Differences: Lock vs synchronized
| Aspect | synchronized | Lock |
|---|---|---|
| Lock management | Automatic | Manual |
| Interruptible lock | No | Yes |
| Timed lock attempt | No | Yes |
| Try-lock | No | Yes |
| Fairness option | No | Yes (ReentrantLock) |
| Condition variables | wait/notify | Condition |
| Error-prone | Low | Higher if misused |
ReentrantLock
ReentrantLock is the most commonly used implementation of the Lock interface.
Features:
- Supports fair and non-fair locking (non-fair by default)
- Reentrant: the same thread can acquire the lock multiple times
- Built on top of AQS (AbstractQueuedSynchronizer)
Fair locks grant access in FIFO order, while non-fair locks prioritize throughput.
Choosing Between Lock and synchronized
As a general rule:
Prefer
synchronizedfor simplicity and safety
UseLockonly when you need advanced features
Use Lock when you need:
- Interruptible lock acquisition
- Timed lock attempts
- Fair locking
- Multiple condition queues
- Locking across non-structured blocks
Otherwise, synchronized is usually the better choice.
Interview Tip
If asked:
What synchronization mechanisms does Java provide?
A solid answer would be:
Java provides built-in synchronization via
synchronizedand more advanced locking mechanisms through theLockAPI, withReentrantLockbeing the most commonly used implementation.
Conclusion
Both synchronized and Lock solve the same core problem: thread safety.
The difference lies in control vs simplicity.
Understanding their internal behavior and trade-offs allows you to make informed choices in both interviews and production systems.