Lock vs Synchronized in Java: When and Why to Use Each

A detailed comparison of Java's synchronized keyword and the Lock API, explaining their differences, use cases, and best practices.

Lock vs Synchronized in Java: When and Why to Use Each

A detailed comparison of Java's synchronized keyword and the Lock API, explaining their differences, use cases, and best practices.

Victory

Introduction

In Java multithreaded programming, ensuring thread safety often involves using synchronized or the Lock API.

A common interview question is:

When should you use synchronized, and when should you use Lock?

To answer this correctly, we need a clear understanding of how both mechanisms work and what trade-offs they involve.

synchronized

synchronized is Java’s built-in locking mechanism that enforces mutual exclusion and memory visibility.

Each synchronized construct has two parts:

  1. A reference to the lock object
    • For synchronized methods, the lock is the current object (this)
  2. A block of code protected by the lock

Every Java object can act as a lock. These built-in locks are also known as intrinsic locks or monitor locks.

Usage Examples

// Method-level synchronization
public synchronized void synchronizedMethod() {
    // critical section
}

// Block-level synchronization
synchronized (lockObject) {
    // critical section
}

Characteristics of synchronized

  • Implicit lock acquisition and release
  • Lock is released automatically when exiting the block or when an exception occurs
  • Only one thread can hold the lock at a time (mutual exclusion)
  • Simple and safe to use

Lock Interface

The Lock interface provides a more flexible and expressive locking mechanism compared to synchronized.

Its key feature is that lock acquisition and release are explicit, giving developers more control.

Core Methods

public interface Lock {
    void lock();
    void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException;
    boolean tryLock();
    boolean tryLock(long time, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException;
    void unlock();
    Condition newCondition();
}

Typical Usage Pattern

Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();

lock.lock();
try {
    // critical section
} finally {
    lock.unlock();
}

Using finally is critical to avoid deadlocks caused by forgotten unlock calls.

Key Differences: Lock vs synchronized

AspectsynchronizedLock
Lock managementAutomaticManual
Interruptible lockNoYes
Timed lock attemptNoYes
Try-lockNoYes
Fairness optionNoYes (ReentrantLock)
Condition variableswait/notifyCondition
Error-proneLowHigher if misused

ReentrantLock

ReentrantLock is the most commonly used implementation of the Lock interface.

Features:

  • Supports fair and non-fair locking (non-fair by default)
  • Reentrant: the same thread can acquire the lock multiple times
  • Built on top of AQS (AbstractQueuedSynchronizer)

Fair locks grant access in FIFO order, while non-fair locks prioritize throughput.

Choosing Between Lock and synchronized

As a general rule:

Prefer synchronized for simplicity and safety
Use Lock only when you need advanced features

Use Lock when you need:

  • Interruptible lock acquisition
  • Timed lock attempts
  • Fair locking
  • Multiple condition queues
  • Locking across non-structured blocks

Otherwise, synchronized is usually the better choice.

Interview Tip

If asked:

What synchronization mechanisms does Java provide?

A solid answer would be:

Java provides built-in synchronization via synchronized and more advanced locking mechanisms through the Lock API, with ReentrantLock being the most commonly used implementation.

Conclusion

Both synchronized and Lock solve the same core problem: thread safety.

The difference lies in control vs simplicity.

Understanding their internal behavior and trade-offs allows you to make informed choices in both interviews and production systems.